PARODY OF LIFE?

Audio-book Review
By Chet Yarbrough

(Blog:awalkingdelight)
Website: chetyarbrough.com

BabbittBabbitt

Written by: Sinclair Lewis 

Narration by:  Grover Gardner

SINCLAIR LEWIS (1885-1951 AMERICAN NOVELIST-FIRST TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PRIZE IN LITERATURE)
SINCLAIR LEWIS (1885-1951 AMERICAN NOVELIST-FIRST TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PRIZE IN LITERATURE)

Sinclair Lewis’s “Babbitt” is categorized as a satire, a parody of life during the roaring twenties, but its story seems no exaggeration of a life in the 20th or 21st century.  Published in 1922, it is considered a classic.  It is said to have influenced Lewis’s award of the Nobel Prize for literature in 1930.  (Lewis is the first American to receive the Nobel Prize in Literature.)  Lewis is highly praised for describing American culture.  “Babbitt” is the eighth of thirteen novels Lewis published by 1930.  Lewis creates a body of work that intimately exposes strengths and weaknesses of American democracy and capitalism.

Reader/listeners are introduced to George F. Babbitt, a man in his forties.  Babbitt is a realtor.  He is financially successful; bored, but not unhappy in his married-with-children’ life.  His best friend, Paul, is equally bored, less financially successful, but deeply unhappy in his marriage.  Paul is harried by a wife that men categorize as shrewish.  Babbitt’s best friend chooses to cheat on his wife.  When Babbitt finds Paul in a clandestine meeting at a Chicago restaurant, he waits for him at a hotel to try to understand what is happening.  In a male-bonding moment Babbitt forgives Paul and agrees that his friend’s wife is a shrew.  Babbitt offers to mislead Paul’s betrayed wife by lying about her husband’s out-of-town business trip.  Later, the spurned wife argues with Paul and is shot in the shoulder.  Babbitt sticks by his friend after he is convicted and sentenced to prison for three years.

After a year of his friend’s incarceration, Babbitt tries to get the spurned wife to forgive her husband and petition the parole board to release Paul early.  She neither forgives nor forgets.  She chastises Babbitt for his deluded belief that her husband deserves any leniency.  This may have been a satirical vignette but it seems more like real life; i.e. where women are rarely viewed as equal to men, and are expected by many to forgive men for violent treatment.

In his mid-forties Babbitt becomes more restless.  He rationalizes infidelity and discounts the value of his wife and family.  He chooses to cheat on his wife because he feels his wife does not understand him.  Babbitt deludes himself with the idea that another sexual relationship is his right and that it will not hurt anyone. One may presume this is another satirical vignette but how many men rationalize their way to extra marital affairs today.

Lewis, through his characters, infers there is a struggle for fair, if not equal treatment,for women, even in the 1920s.  In “Babbitt”, Lewis never gives women a role as superiors or equals that might have intellectual interests in government, society, or culture.  Rather, Lewis suggests women feign interest in a man’s thoughts for the desire of companionship, attention, affection; rather than intellectual stimulation or sexual gratification.  Men are shown to classify women as shrewish because they are pushing husbands to be more expressive and attentive. There are many ways of interpreting Lewis’s intent but this is not satire, it is a truth of many men’s view of women.

An underlying theme in “Babbitt” is the inequality of American capitalism.  Women and most minorities are less equal because they are either not in the work force, or in the work force at a lower wage.  The union movement is struggling for recognition in the 1920s because of low wages being paid by business owners.  Lewis suggests Babbitt begins to modify his opinion about the labor movement as he becomes entangled in the lives of less successful Americans like Paul and a woman who becomes Babbitt’s lover.  This is a kind of private revolution in Babbitt’s upper middle class conservatism.

Wealthy capitalist see the answer to the union movement is electing a business President that cracks down on unions.  Capitalists who have money and power classify the union movement as anarchic, communist, and/or socialist.  Babbitt senses there is something wrong when he sees some union supporters are from the educated class.  What makes Lewis’s observations fascinating is that they are written when America is in the midst of the roaring twenties; before the beginning of the Great Depression.  In the early 1920s, capitalism seems to be a tide raising all boats when in fact it is a torpedo being readied for launch.

Babbitt experiences peer pressure that causes him to recant his private revolutionary beliefs; i.e. fellow businessman’s perception of his union sympathy.  Babbitt eventually returns to the fold of do-nothing conservatism.  He recants his libertine ways and returns to hearth and home. But Lewis offers a twist by having Babbitt’s son shock the family by rebelling against standards of upper middle class life.  He decides to drop college and marry without the blessings of his family or church.  George F. Babbitt is the only family member who wholeheartedly supports his son’s unconventional act.

Lewis writes in the midst of a burgeoning American industrial revolution.  It seems what happened in the 1920s is similar to what is happening today.  The industrial revolution is now the technology revolution; women are still undervalued, many Americans want a business President elected, and unions are being busted.  Today’s young men and women are still breaking social conventions.  The stage seems set.  One hopes 2015 is not America’s new roaring twenties; pending another economic crash.

Views All Time
Views All Time
Views Today
Views Today
(Visited 29 time, 1 visit today)

Always good to hear from you!