WWII

Audio-book Review
By Chet Yarbrough

(Blog:awalkingdelight)
Website: chetyarbrough.com

winter of the worldWinter of the World

By Ken Follett 

Narrated by John Lee

KEN FOLLETT

KEN FOLLETT

For those who read or listened to Ken Follett’s first book, “Fall of Giants”, the Fitzherbert- Williams’, Dewer, and Peshkov’ families live on.  “Winter of the World”, explores the history of WWII through the lives, loves, hates, and deaths of these English’, American’, and Russian’ families.

Listeners will be fascinated and entertained in the same way they were in the first novel.  Follett creates characters that are imperfect; neither totally good nor bad but measures of both, just like real human beings.  Follett shows the human attraction capitalism, socialism, fascism, and communism have for many people in different cultures.

The attraction of capitalism is summarized in one vignette about a communist spy in America that smuggles an American’ merchandise catalogue home to Russia to show his wife how different capitalism is in America from communism in Russia.

Socialism’s appeal is shown by the Williams family’s rise from lower class laborers to Parliament.  The injustice of income inequality is laid bare by the conflicts between the Fitzherbert’s and Williams’ families.

Fascism’s appeal is illustrated by youth movements and rapid industrialization in the early days of Hitler’s Germany that improves German employment and security.  The foolish treaty of WWI that imposes crushing war reparations on Germany galvanizes German youth to believe in fascism.  Means justify ends.

Communist appeal is shown in the rhetoric of the Russian Peskov family’s conversations.  Father and son believe Stalinist’ mistakes are merely short term consequences of a journey toward perfect communist equality.

Follett also shows the dark side of capitalism, socialism, fascism, and communism.  Capitalism’s dark side is obscured but hints are shown in anti-gay sentiment, discrimination against minorities and women, and the prominent role wealth plays in American society.

Follett moves on to picture the dark side of socialism in Great Britain.  He writes about an incident of England’s confiscation of private property for coal.  Follett infers government confiscation is a mistake when he writes of a working class mother that regrets seeing a private garden estate, built by generations of the Fitzherbert’ family, taken and destroyed by the government.

The rise of dictators in Spain, Germany, and Italy show the dark side of fascism with Franco’s, Hitler’s, and Mussolini’s assumption of power.  The most prominent exemplar of fascism’s dark side is Nazism; i.e. Follett recounts stories of Brown Shirt’ thuggery, Gestapo’ violence, and blind, insensitive and brutal actions of German’ bureaucrats. The Nazis organize to exterminate the old, the infirm, and the mentally and physically handicapped to “purify” the Teutonic race.  Nazi leaders pursue a policy characterized as the “final solution”; i.e. the extermination of all Jews within Germany’s jurisdiction.

Follett infers that the mean and dark side of Stalinism equals the brutality of Nazisim.  Follett’s stories of Stalinist actions suggest there is little difference between the darkness of Stalinist communism and Hitler’s fascism.  The darkness of communism is amplified by Follett’s description of Germany’s occupation and the horrible treatment of German citizens by Russian soldiers.  Follett contrasts selfless German spies working for Russia to defeat Nazism  with the inhumanity of Russian soldiers as they enter Berlin.  The contrast of Russian occupation with selfless German spies makes Russian soldiers look as evil as the Nazis.

Listening to “Winter of the World” reminds one of George Martin’s phrase in “Game of Thrones”; i.e. “winter is coming”.  The depiction of Hitler’s rise to power is made brutally clear but the role of Stalinist Russia seems as darkly described as German fascism.  One is reminded of Martin’s fictional walking dead in Russia’s retaliation for Germany’s invasion of the motherland.  Russian soldiers move south, like Martin’s walking dead that march south to attack fictional’ Winterfell, while brutally murdering every human being in sight.

The duplicity of Stalin in bargaining with Hitler and then joining the American and Allied powers, when Hitler attacks Russia, is well known. But Follett’s stories of Russian atrocity make Russian soldiers look like “Game of Thrones” zombies–pillaging, and murdering every person south of Russia.

There is no doubt Russia committed horrendous crimes in their southwestern march through Poland and Germany.  However, there seems a lack of balance in Follett’s characterization of Russia’s role in WWII.  As cruel and dictatorial as history shows Stalin to have been, Russian’ soldiers are the first to defeat German’ armies in WWII.  Every Allied Power committed atrocious acts of war.  Great Britain bombs civilian cities in Germany.  The United States drops two nuclear bombs on Japan.

War has little conscience with all participants focusing on a zero sum game.  Ken Follett notes that Japan is cornered by the Allied powers’ embargo of fuel.  This gives some balance to Japan’s reason for bombing Pearl Harbor.  In contrast, Follett says little about Russia’s justification for being beasts of the north.

Despite this quibble about history, Follett writes an entertaining story about WWII.  “Winter of the World” continues to follow the fictional families of Follett’s first book in his trilogy of the twentieth century.  Follett keeps the main characters of “Fall of Giants” and adds fascinating new characters from the same families.  They are all enmeshed in historical events of WWII.  Follett reaffirms his skill in writing a great entertainment about historic world events.

WATERGATE

Audio-book Review
By Chet Yarbrough

(Blog:awalkingdelight)
Website: chetyarbrough.com 

WATERGATEWatergate (A Novel)

By Thomas Mallon

Narrated by Joe Barrett

THOMAS MALLON

THOMAS MALLON

This novel about “Watergate” will offend

RICHARD NIXON (1913-1994)

RICHARD NIXON (1913-1994)

and entertain. It will offend those who believe Nixon was a great political leader.  It will entertain those who believe Nixon was simply a man with strengths and weaknesses, overblown by great power.  Mallon cleverly weaves a story of the  Watergate break-in that magnifies its stupidity by revealing known facts and improbable speculations.

WATERGATE BUILDING

WATERGATE BUILDING

The two most memorable characters of the novel are the least well-known, Frederick

FRED LaRUE (1928-2004)

FRED LaRUE (1928-2004)

LaRue and Alice Longworth.

ALICE ROOSEVELT LONGWORTH (1884-1980)

ALICE ROOSEVELT LONGWORTH (1884-1980)

Frederick LaRue is the bag-man that carries cash to Watergate burglars to keep them quiet.  As a counter-point to Nixon’s Watergate culpability, Mellon suggests that LaRue goes to his grave believing he murdered his father on a drunken hunting trip.  One wonders what Watergate perspective Nixon takes to the grave.

Alice Longworth, the oldest daughter of Theodore Roosevelt, is a “gadfly” and self-professed octogenarian hedonist that offers comic relief to a tragic story.  Nixon is alleged to have said that Alice Longworth is “the most interesting conversationalist of the age.”  Mallon reinforces that belief in comments he assigns to the colorful Ms. Longworth.  LaRue and Longworth are cinematographic enhancements to Watergate’s black and white story.

DOROTHY HUNT (1920-1972)

DOROTHY HUNT (1920-1972)

E. HOWARD HUNT (1918-2007)

E. HOWARD HUNT (1918-2007)

Mallon offers interesting portraits of lesser characters, like E. Howard Hunt’s wife, Dorothy.  (E. Howard Hunt is the ex-CIA operative that is in charge of the Watergate burglary.)  She is described as a tough lady; deeply loved by her husband.  Mallon’s picture of Dorothy Hunt’s dogged pursuit of hush money and her mysterious death in a plane crash revives speculation about Watergate conspiracy theories.

ELLIOT RICHARDSON (1920-1999)

ELLIOT RICHARDSON (1920-1999)

A portrait of Elliot Richardson suggests a man of great ambition that uses his patrician, Bostonian mien, and various government appointments, in a Machiavellian pursuit of the presidency.  Richardson fails in his pursuit and one wonders how much of his failure is from hubris, a quality quite evident in Nixon’s handling of Watergate.

MARTHA MITCHELL (1918-1976)

MARTHA MITCHELL (1918-1976)

Martha Mitchell is shown as an alcoholic party-going tippler that voraciously and publicly defends her husband, John

JOHN MITCHELL (1913-1988)

JOHN MITCHELL (1913-1988)

Mitchell (Nixon’s Attorney General), by accusing the administration of directing Mitchell’s Watergate involvement. Martha loves John and John loves Martha; she seems to say what Mitchell thinks but refuses to say.

JEB MAGRUDER (LIVING STATEN ISLAND-AGE 78)

JEB MAGRUDER (LIVING STATEN ISLAND-AGE 78)

Jeb Magruder appears as a people pleaser that charms LaRue, lies to government investigators, recants his testimony, implicates Mitchell and goes to prison to write a book about his trail of destruction.  LaRue has an apocryphal meeting with Magruder in prison that suggests the Watergate burglary is a misunderstood adventure, even before its beginning.

ROSEMARY WOODS (1917-2005)

ROSEMARY WOODS (1917-2005)

No surprises about Nixon’s secretary, Rosemary Woods, that is shown as a loyal follower of the Nixon family and defender of Nixon’s memory.  Mallon suggests Woods’ 18 minute Nixon’ tape-gap is not to cover up Presidential complicity in Watergate but to assuage a personal slight of Ms. Woods by H.R. Haldeman.

ALEXANDER HAIG (1924-2010)

ALEXANDER HAIG (1924-2010)

Alexander Haig appears as a cheerleader in the darkest times of the scandal; i.e. a person that looks for silver linings in every dark omen coming from subpoenaed tapes and a pending impeachment.

Aside from an unnecessary fictional side story of an extramarital affair for Mrs. Nixon, Mallon gives his audience an excellent story.  He successfully reveals how inconsequential the Watergate burglary is but how momentous the cover-up became.  Nixon did not lose the Presidency from the petty burglary; he lost it from the cover-up.  Just as LaRue is not found guilty of murdering his father, Nixon is not convicted for a petty crime.  However, both feel punished for the remainder of their lives.  As Forest Gump said, “stupid is as stupid does”.

REINCARNATION

Audio-book Review
 By Chet Yarbrough

(Blog:awalkingdelight)
Website: chetyarbrough.com

Life and Death are Wearing Me OutLife and Death are Wearing Me Out

By Mo Yan (Translated by Howard Goldblatt) 

Narrated by Feodor Chin

MO YAN

MO YAN

Cultural understanding is missing from Howard Goldblatt’s translation of Mo Yan’s “Life and Death are Wearing Me Out”.  Mo Yan binds reincarnation to China’s twentieth century history. The choice of reincarnation adds humor but suggests something more than laughs.  The story begins with a murdered man who comes back as a donkey, then as an ox, a pig, a dog, and finally as another man—funny, but is there rhyme or reason in the order?

China becomes communist in the 1940s under the leadership of Mao Zedong.  Communism seeks re-distribution of private land into cooperatives to benefit the many at the expense of the few.  Mo Yan’s story begins with China’s communist revolution and the unjust murder and confiscation of a landowner’s farm.

The murdered landowner is Ximen Nao.  After death, Ximen Nao falls into an imagined purgatory to be, presumably, cleansed of his sins.  Despite severe torture, Ximen Nao refuses purgatory’s judgment of sin.  In consequence, or happenstance, he is reincarnated as a donkey.  The twist in his reincarnation is that he remembers his former life.  Returning to life as a donkey, he meets former employees, a wife, two mistresses, and his children.

Ximen Nao, as a donkey, returns to his homeland and finds that his former employee has married one of his mistresses and is farming 6 acres of his confiscated land.  Ximen Nao, as a reincarnated donkey, gains a grudging respect for his former employee.  The employee steadfastly resists public ownership (becoming part of a communist co-op) and insists on being an independent farmer.  (Communist China’s law allows a farmer to be independent if they choose to work the land themselves.)

The former employee and his wife become emotionally attached to the donkey because they believe it is a reincarnation of an important person in their lives.  (Later, Ximen Nao’s wife consciously acknowledges that the donkey is a reincarnation of her husband.) The independent farmer and his wife cherish the donkey’s existence and its aid in farming the land.  Several incidents involving the donkey, and future animal incarnations, reflect on life in China during Mao Zedong’s reign.

Mo Yan straddles acceptance and rejection of communism and China’s current form of capitalism.  His story skewers both political systems.  In Mo Yan’s story, communism and its belief in public ownership are defeated by human nature’s drive for freedom and independence.  The independent farmer lives through Mao’s Cultural Revolution and witnesses the return of a capitalist form of property ownership.  Mo Yan denigrates communism’s intrusion in family affairs and how it turns a son against father, brother against brother, and compels women to choose between family and a communist’ collective way of life.

Capitalism and unfettered freedom are also ridiculed. Mo Yan characterizes capitalism in a story about the lives of spoiled youth.  Youth that live off their family’s wealth; living for adventure; denigrating love, productive work, and respect for tradition and family.  Mo Yan shows how singular pursuit of wealth corrupts morality; how leisure becomes more important than caring for others or working for human improvement.

Is there some significance in the order of Ximen Nao’s reincarnations?  Ximen Nao is first reincarnated as a donkey, then as an ox, then as a pig, then as a dog, and finally as another man.  It is a clever way of observing history through the prism of different animal’s lives.  It also makes one wonder about humankind’s ethnocentricity and failure to respect all living things.

Finding the right balance in life is an overriding theme in Mo Yan’s story.  As the inscription on the temple of Apollo at Delphi suggests, “Nothing in excess”; Aristotle, Benjamin Franklin, Mark Twain and many others have suggested moderation in all things. Mo Yan suggests that both Chinese communism and capitalism fail to offer the right balance in life.